<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Scrooges to Avoid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitterfools</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>twitterfools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterfools.com/?p=1631#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phillip, glad you liked it! Come back again soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phillip, glad you liked it! Come back again soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Dews</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Dews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterfools.com/?p=1631#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Wowowowowowow! some list there goto love it! Thanks guys for a great post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wowowowowowow! some list there goto love it! Thanks guys for a great post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santa Knows if Your Tweets Have Been Naughty or Nice &#124; Twitter Fools</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Santa Knows if Your Tweets Have Been Naughty or Nice &#124; Twitter Fools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterfools.com/?p=1631#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] much to our dismay, that we&#8217;ve been naughty! Must have been all the promotion of our post on Twitter Scrooges to Avoid earlier in the week. It turns out we don&#8217;t have a clue what a Su-Bo serenade is, so we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much to our dismay, that we&#8217;ve been naughty! Must have been all the promotion of our post on Twitter Scrooges to Avoid earlier in the week. It turns out we don&#8217;t have a clue what a Su-Bo serenade is, so we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitterfools</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>twitterfools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterfools.com/?p=1631#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Meg, thanks for your comment, kind words and editing tips! Ah, the frenzied life of blogging, sometime we check the spelling but not context.  In this post, we are going to stand by &#039;edumacation&#039; however.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meg, thanks for your comment, kind words and editing tips! Ah, the frenzied life of blogging, sometime we check the spelling but not context.  In this post, we are going to stand by &#39;edumacation&#39; however.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterfools.com/?p=1631#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Excellent and well-thought list. I can think of a few more but hey, I don&#039;t want to be too much of a Grinch ;o)&lt;br&gt;(BTW, at total risk of outing myself as an editor, the correct spelling is &quot;waste&quot; rather than &quot;waist&quot; in this context. Sorry for being a pain in the arse. Just delete this post and I won&#039;t be the least bit offended.)&lt;br&gt;Blessings and keep up the good work! &lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent and well-thought list. I can think of a few more but hey, I don&#39;t want to be too much of a Grinch ;o)<br />(BTW, at total risk of outing myself as an editor, the correct spelling is &#8220;waste&#8221; rather than &#8220;waist&#8221; in this context. Sorry for being a pain in the arse. Just delete this post and I won&#39;t be the least bit offended.)<br />Blessings and keep up the good work! &lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twitterfools</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>twitterfools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterfools.com/?p=1631#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Admittedly, we could have included many celebrities for the reason you cite, but alas - we just don&#039;t have enough room for them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admittedly, we could have included many celebrities for the reason you cite, but alas &#8211; we just don&#39;t have enough room for them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TwitterFail</title>
		<link>http://www.twitterfools.com/opinion/twitter-scrooges-to-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>TwitterFail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterfools.com/?p=1631#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Nice list. I&#039;m surprised there aren&#039;t more celebrities on it. But then, that would require a much larger list to include all the ones who twitter as an ego stroke, and don&#039;t care to really interact with their fans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for including my blog. You&#039;re awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list. I&#39;m surprised there aren&#39;t more celebrities on it. But then, that would require a much larger list to include all the ones who twitter as an ego stroke, and don&#39;t care to really interact with their fans.</p>
<p>Thanks for including my blog. You&#39;re awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

